Governor Otti’s Administration and the Troubling Pattern of Inconsistency | #NwokeukwuMascot

 Opinion 

File Image

In governance, consistency is a mark of credibility. It assures citizens that policies and pronouncements are not mere rhetoric but commitments backed by concrete action. However, in Abia State, Governor Alex Otti’s administration appears entangled in a web of contradictions, raising questions about its ability to uphold transparency and accountability. From the contentious implementation of the minimum wage to labor disputes with civil servants and pensioners, a recurring pattern of discrepancies has left many wondering whether these inconsistencies are mere administrative lapses or a reflection of deeper governance issues.

In October 2024, the Abia State Government announced the implementation of the new minimum wage, claiming to have begun full payments. This was celebrated by the Government as a milestone achievement, even as civil servants and the Abia State Labour Union raised concerns about the structure of the payments. The workers insisted that the salary adjustment was neither well-defined nor reflective of the actual wage increase expected.

Further fueling the controversy, sometime in May 2024, Governor Otti, during his first-anniversary speech in office, boldly stated that Abia would be the first state to implement the new federal minimum wage once it was approved. However, the realities on the ground contradicted this declaration. Civil servants continued to lament that the so-called increase was far from what was promised, yet the administration dismissed these grievances, branding them as opposition-driven criticisms.

Ironically, yesterday the very concerns that were once dismissed as “opposition propaganda” eventually led to negotiations between the state government and labor leaders. According to reports, a formal agreement was reached, proving that the workers’ complaints had merit all along. This back-and-forth raises a fundamental question: If the administration had truly implemented the minimum wage as claimed, why was there a need for further negotiations and an eventual agreement?

The minimum wage controversy is just one instance in a series of contradictions that have defined Governor Otti’s administration. Another glaring example was the dispute involving the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), Abia State chapter. At the peak of the crisis, the governor insisted that the judiciary workers had been fully paid and accused union leaders of being the stumbling block to industrial harmony. However, this claim was later proven false when the government had to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the union, leading to the suspension of the strike on January 30, 2025.

A similar tactic was deployed in dealing with Abia’s pensioners. Governor Otti had publicly declared that the state had completed in what he termed the “last and final payment” of pension arrears, implying that all outstanding entitlements had been settled. However, it later emerged that pensioners had been misled into signing documents that effectively forfeited their arrears. The backlash from this deceptive move was swift, as the affected retirees and stakeholders criticized the administration for what they described as a betrayal of trust.

I could go on with the list, which includes the premium whiskey-inspired KPMG forensic audit announced in the U.S. that later turned out to be nothing more than an ordinary process review. There’s also the Aba power plant saga, where the governor, on national television, claimed that the previous administration made no contributions to the project—only for documents to later emerge proving that past governments had invested over $3.5 million in it. The list goes on and on.

These incidents, among others, suggest a disturbing trend in the Otti-led government—one characterized by premature declarations, denials, and eventual backtracking when the truth becomes undeniable. The administration has, on multiple occasions, attempted to deflect criticism by branding dissenters as enemies of the state or opposition sympathizers. But as time has repeatedly shown, many of these so-called opposition claims have turned out to be accurate.

Governance is built on trust, and when leaders consistently fail to match words with actions, public confidence erodes. The people of Abia deserve leadership that is not only decisive but also honest and transparent. Repeated inconsistencies in policy execution, especially on critical issues affecting workers and pensioners, do not inspire faith in the administration’s competence.

Abians must recognize their collective responsibility in holding their leaders accountable. It is not enough to accept political rhetoric at face value; citizens must ask critical questions and demand clarity on policies that affect their lives. Why does the Otti administration repeatedly make claims that are later contradicted by facts? Why does it take public outcry before the government acknowledges and addresses its missteps?

These are questions that the people of Abia must insist on getting answers to. Governance is not about media optics or political spin—it is about delivering tangible results that improve lives. If the current administration cannot provide consistency in its words and actions, then the people must take a stand and demand better.

©️NMN